NewsNOX METALS Raises an $11.5M Seed Round to Reindustrialize America

Cast Tool and Jig Plate vs 6061 vs 7075 Selector

Cast tool and jig plate exists because it can be made flat and stay flat, but it has about half the tensile strength of 6061, it welds badly, and it anodizes blotchy. Answer six questions about your part and this tool tells you which plate to buy, with the tradeoff numbers side by side instead of a forum argument.

Last updated July 2026

Six questions about the part
1. Fixture or load-bearing part
2. Does it get welded
3. Anodize or finish for appearance
4. Flatness needed
5. How much material comes off
6. Tapped for high load fasteners
Service environment
Recommendation
5000 series cast tool and jig plate
Flatness and stability decide this one: cast tool and jig plate arrives flat within 0.015 in over the whole plate with essentially no residual stress, so it stays flat after you take a light skim on both faces out of it.
Confidence
High
Score margin
7 vs 2
Cost per part vs 6061
1.13x
Runner-up
6061-T651
Scored 2 against 7. The single answer carrying the decision is "Fixture, subplate or jig". Change that answer to call it a load-bearing part instead of a fixture and the recommendation moves to 6061-T651.
Expected flatness over 24 in of span
OptionAs supplied, inPer footMove after cut, inMeets target
Cast tool and jig plate0.01500.00750.0001no
6061-T6510.05000.02500.0009no
7075-T6510.05000.02500.0017no
rolled flatness = 0.200 x (24 / 48)^2 = 0.0500"cast flatness = 0.0150" over the whole plate, not span scaledtarget = 0.005 x (24 / 12) = 0.0100"movement = (residual / E) x 0.08 x 24^2 / (8 x 1.000)

The 0.015 in cast figure is a whole-plate guarantee, so over a short span the real deviation is usually far less than the number shown. Movement is a first-order estimate of midspan bow from releasing residual stress, not a simulation. Leave stock and rough-then-rest either way, and size the blank with the raw stock size optimizer.

As-supplied bow over your span
span 24"target 0.010"rolled 0.050"cast 0.015"deviation exaggerated for readability
Relative cost, per pound and per finished part
OptionCost per lbOrder nominal, inCost per part
Cast tool and jig plate1.40x1.0001.13x
6061-T6511.00x1.2501.00x
7075-T6512.10x1.2502.18x
cost per part = cost per lb x (ordered nominal / finished thickness) x density ratio, normalized to 6061cast: 1.40 x (1.000 / 1.000) = 1.13x6061: 1.00 x (1.250 / 1.000) = 1.00x baseline

Cast plate holds plus or minus 0.005 in on thickness and arrives flat, so you order it at the finished nominal. Rolled plate has to clear its own minus tolerance plus a cleanup cut on each face, which normally costs you one nominal step. That is why a 1.40x per pound premium lands closer to 1.13x per finished part.

Score breakdown, weighted rules
Your answerCast60617075
Fixture, subplate or jig410
Flatness 0.005 in per foot300
Light skim both faces, under 10 percent011
Total721

This is a weighted rule engine, not a physics model. It encodes the tradeoffs shops argue about so the argument happens once, in the open, with the numbers visible.

Purchase order line, copy and paste

1 pc 5000 series cast tool and jig plate, 1.000" nominal +/-0.005" x 24" x 24", cast, thermally stress relieved, machined both faces, flat within 0.015" over the plate, finished thickness 1.000", mill cert and DFARS domestic melt required.

Side by side, fifteen properties
Property5000 series cast tool and jig plate6061-T6517075-T651
Base alloyCast aluminum-magnesium, roughly 5xxx chemistry. ALCA-5 class is a modified 5083 typeWrought Al-Mg-SiWrought Al-Zn-Mg-Cu
Product routeCast, thermally stress relieved, machined both facesRolled, solution treated, quenched, stretched 1.5 to 3 percentRolled, solution treated, quenched, stretched
Ultimate tensile, psi23,000 typical45,000 typical (42,000 min, B209)83,000 typical (78,000 min, B209)
Tensile yield, psi12,000 typical40,000 typical (35,000 min, B209)73,000 typical (68,000 min, B209)
Elongation, percent3 typical8 to 10 min5 to 7 min
Brinell, typical6595150
Density, lb per cubic inch0.0980.09750.101
As-supplied flatness0.015 in over the whole plate, guaranteedCommercial B209, up to about 0.20 in on a 48 in wide 1 in plateSame as 6061
Thickness tolerancePlus or minus 0.005 inASTM B209 band, about plus or minus 0.035 in at 1.000 nominalSame as 6061
Residual stressEssentially noneLow, roughly 1.5 ksi peakModerate, roughly 3 ksi peak
Stability after machiningExcellent, stays about as flat as it startedGoodFair, moves about twice as much as 6061
MachinabilityExcellent, chips break clean, watch for porosity in a finished surfaceGood, gummy, wants sharp polished toolingExcellent chip breaking in T651
WeldabilityPoor, porosity and cracking, not recommendedGood with 4043 or 5356 fillerNot recommended, crack sensitive
Anodize responsePoor, blotchy, varies heat to heat. ALCA-5 class looks better than Mic-6 classVery good, the reference materialGood, comes out darker, hard coat builds slower
Relative cost per pound1.40x1.00x2.10x

Tensile and yield for the wrought alloys are typical values with the ASTM B209 minimum in parentheses. Buy to the minimum, design to the minimum, expect the typical.

Myth buster
Mic-6 and ALCA-5 are different materials

They are competing cast tooling plate products of the same class with near-identical published flatness and thickness specs. Both are cast, then stress relieved, then machined on both faces. The real differences show up in anodize appearance and lot-to-lot consistency, not in strength or flatness.

QC-10 is a cast plate

It is not. QC-10 is a wrought 7000 series mold plate and it belongs in the 7075 and 7050 column, not the cast column. If someone tells you to use QC-10 instead of Mic-6 for flatness, they are recommending a different product category with roughly three times the tensile strength and a different price.

Tooling plate is just flatter 6061

Cast tool plate is about half the tensile strength of 6061 and about a quarter of 7075. That is the price of the flatness. It is a different alloy family on a different product route, not a premium grade of the same thing.

7075 is always the strong answer in thick sections

Above 2.000 in, specify 7050-T7451 instead of 7075-T651. 7075 is quench sensitive and loses core properties as section thickness goes up. 7050 was designed for exactly that problem and holds its properties through the thickness.

How to use this selector

  1. Decide what the plate actually does. A fixture, subplate or jig is held to flatness. A load-bearing part is held to strength. If it is both, say so and the scoring blends the two.
  2. Answer the two hard-rule questions honestly. Welding removes 7075 outright and rules out cast plate. Clear or dyed anodize for appearance rules out cast plate.
  3. Set the flatness you actually need in inches per foot, and the span you need it over. Flatness over a 12 inch subplate and flatness over a 60 inch bed are different problems, and rolled plate bow scales with the square of the span.
  4. Enter the finished thickness, not the stock thickness. The tool works out the nominal you have to order for each candidate, which is where most of the real cost difference lives.
  5. Say how much material comes off. Heavy or one-sided removal is what releases residual stress, and it is the single biggest reason shops move to cast plate.
  6. Read the runner-up card. It names the one answer that is carrying the decision, so you can see how close the call really is before you pay a premium.
  7. Copy the purchase order line. It names a specific product, nominal, tolerance and process so your supplier cannot substitute a different product category on you.

Fixture plate material reference

MaterialProduct routeTensile, psiYield, psiBrinellDensity, lb/in3As-supplied flatnessCost per lbWhere it belongs
Cast tool and jig plate, Mic-6 classCast, stress relieved, faced23,000 typ12,000 typ650.0980.015 in over plate1.40xFixture plates, subplates, jigs, checking fixtures
Cast tool and jig plate, ALCA-5 classCast, stress relieved, faced23,000 typ12,000 typ650.0980.015 in over plate1.40xSame as Mic-6 class, better anodize appearance
6061-T651Rolled, quenched, stretched45,000 typ / 42,000 min40,000 typ / 35,000 min950.0975Commercial, about 0.20 in at 1 in x 48 in1.00xGeneral plate, welded parts, anodized parts
7075-T651Rolled, quenched, stretched83,000 typ / 78,000 min73,000 typ / 68,000 min1500.101Commercial, same grid as 60612.10xStructural and high load parts up to 2.000 in
7075-T7351Rolled, overaged, stretched73,000 typ63,000 typ1350.101Commercial, same grid as 60612.25xMarine and humid service, stress corrosion resistance
7050-T7451Rolled, overaged, stretched76,000 typ68,000 typ1400.102Commercial, same grid as 60612.50xThick sections over 2.000 in, aerospace structure
7000 series mold plate, QC-10 classRolled, wrought, NOT cast74,000 typ64,000 typ1400.102Mold plate grade, tighter than Commercial2.60xMold bases and high polish tooling, often confused with Mic-6
5083-H321Rolled, strain hardened46,000 typ33,000 typ820.096Commercial1.30xWelded marine structure, the wrought cousin of cast tool plate
2024-T351Rolled, naturally aged, stretched68,000 typ47,000 typ1200.100Commercial1.80xFatigue critical aerospace parts, poor corrosion resistance

Typical values are what a mill cert usually reports. Minimum values are the ASTM B209 guarantee for the temper and thickness range, and they are the only numbers you should design to. Cost per pound is indexed against 6061-T651 at 1.00 and moves with market and quantity. Note that QC-10 class mold plate sits in this table as a wrought 7000 series product, not a cast one.

How it works

The recommendation is a weighted rule engine

Hard disqualifications run first. Welding removes 7075-T651 and flags cast plate. Appearance anodize flags cast plate. High load tapped holes in material under 0.750 inch remove cast plate. A marine environment on a load-bearing part removes 7075-T651 and substitutes 7075-T7351, or 7050-T7451 above 2 inches. Whatever survives is then scored, starting from zero, on use case, flatness requirement, span, thickness, material removal, tapped holes and finish. Highest score wins and the score margin sets the confidence line.

Expected flatness over your span

rolled deviation = Commercial grid value at your thickness x (span / 48)^2

cast deviation = 0.015 in over the whole plate, not span scaled

target deviation = flatness per foot x (span / 12)

Rolled plate bow scales with the square of the length you measure across, which is why a plate that looks fine on a 12 inch subplate is unusable as a 60 inch bed plate. The cast figure is a whole-plate guarantee, so over a short span the real deviation is normally far below 0.015 inch.

Movement after machining

midspan bow = (peak residual stress / elastic modulus) x removal fraction x span^2 / (8 x thickness)

Peak residual stress is taken as roughly 200 psi for cast and stress relieved tool plate, 1,500 psi for stretched 6061-T651 and 3,000 psi for stretched 7075-T651. Removal fraction is 0.08 for a light skim, 0.25 for moderate removal and 0.55 for heavy or one-sided pocketing. This is a first-order estimate of the bow you release, not a simulation.

Relative cost per finished part

cost per part = cost per pound x (ordered nominal / finished thickness) x density ratio

rolled ordered nominal = smallest standard nominal where nominal minus B209 thickness tolerance minus 0.020 in cleanup is still at or above the finished thickness

cast ordered nominal = smallest standard nominal at or above the finished thickness

Cost per pound runs 1.00 for 6061-T651, 1.40 for cast tool and jig plate, 2.10 for 7075-T651 and 2.50 for 7050-T7451. Because cast plate holds plus or minus 0.005 inch and arrives flat, it usually orders one nominal thinner than rolled plate for the same finished dimension, which is why the 1.40x per pound premium typically lands near 1.13x per finished part.

Once the selector names a plate, the next question is what a blank actually costs at your size. Get an instant quote on 6061, 7075 and 7050 plate cut to your fixture size, DFARS domestic material with mill certs on every order.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Mic-6 and ALCA-5?

Very little on paper. Both are 5000 series cast aluminum tooling plate, cast then thermally stress relieved then machined on both faces, and both are supplied flat within about 0.015 inch over the whole plate at plus or minus 0.005 inch thickness. They are competing products of the same class, not different materials. The differences shops actually notice are in anodize appearance and lot-to-lot consistency, where ALCA-5 class material generally behaves better.

Is cast tooling plate better than 6061 for a fixture plate?

For a fixture, usually yes. Cast tool and jig plate arrives flat within 0.015 inch over the whole plate against roughly 0.20 inch for Commercial grade rolled 6061, holds plus or minus 0.005 inch on thickness, and carries almost no residual stress so it stays flat after you cut pockets in it. The tradeoff is strength: about 23 ksi tensile against 45 ksi for 6061-T651. Use 6061 when the plate carries load, gets welded, or gets anodized.

What alloy is Mic-6 tooling plate?

Mic-6 class cast tooling plate is a cast aluminum-magnesium alloy in the 5000 series family, not a heat-treatable 6000 or 7000 series alloy. That is why it cannot be strengthened by heat treatment, why it runs about 23 ksi tensile and 12 ksi yield, and why it stays dimensionally stable. It is cast rather than rolled, which is the whole reason it has no rolling stress to release when you machine it.

Is QC-10 the same as Mic-6?

No, and this is the most common mix-up in the category. QC-10 is a wrought 7000 series mold plate, not a cast product. It has roughly three times the tensile strength of Mic-6 class cast plate and belongs in the same column as 7075 and 7050. If a shop recommends QC-10 as an alternative to Mic-6 for flatness, they are proposing a different product category at a different price point, not a like-for-like swap.

Can you anodize cast tooling plate?

You can, but expect blotchy and inconsistent results. Cast plate has a non-uniform grain structure, chemistry varies between heats because of the scrap content in the melt, and porosity can trap acid, so the coating builds unevenly and the color shifts lot to lot. If the part must be anodized for appearance, machine it from wrought 6061-T651 instead. If it is a fixture that just needs corrosion protection, chem film is the practical answer.

Is tooling plate worth the extra cost?

For fixtures with real flatness requirements, usually yes, and by less than the per-pound premium suggests. Cast tool and jig plate runs roughly 1.4 times 6061 per pound, but because it holds plus or minus 0.005 inch on thickness you can order it one nominal thinner for the same finished dimension, which recovers 10 to 20 percent of that. Add the second op you do not have to run to flatten it and the premium usually pays for itself.

Related Tools

Related Reading